January 2025 - EXPERT WRITING HELP BLOG

Step-by-Step Guide to Writing CIPS Corporate Award Practitioner

Guide to Writing CIPS Corporate Award Practitioner

Before we go on, are you ready to prove your procurement skills at the international playground? Oh – I can hear your heart beating for the coveted MCIPS membership or Chartered Status. I wrote this step-by-step guide to writing CIPS corporate award practitioner to give you the much-needed headstart.

Every procurement professional taking this virtual (online) program may be ready for flexible arrangements and seminars. As for the assessed assignments such as CIPS Corporate Award Practitioner ~ well, you need us more than ever. This guide will make the daunting task of writing this all-important assignment manageable for professionals with a packed diary.

Did You Know?

The Chartered Institute of Procurement and Supply (CIPS) is a modular, work-based learning program leading to a CIPS Diploma. Upon completion, procurement professionals qualify for MCIPS membership, a prerequisite for Chartered status.

Why the CIPS Corporate Award Practitioner Matters

You’re probably wondering how the rigorous CIPS training will benefit you in the end. Over 50% of job ads for Supply Management in America quote a CIPS qualification OR continuing studies towards the same. Moreso, CIPS candidates build procurement professionalism, consequently helping businesses to reduce risk and deliver greater organizational value.

We’ll Help You Rise Through the CIPS Ranks!

If you’re an apprentice who doesn’t wish to struggle with CIPS grades, you’ve made the right decision early in your study path. Below is what lurks ahead ~ but there’s absolutely no reason to freak out so long as you’re subscribed to our CIPS assignment help in Saudi Arabia

There are 6 distinct CIPS levels, and our expert assignment assistants are ready to support you with:

CIPS Level 2: Certificate in Procurement and Supply.
CIPS Level 3: Advanced Certificate in Procurement and Supply Operations. This is an entry-level apprentice position, specially designed for Procurement and Supply assistants.
CIPS Level 4: Diploma in Procurement and Supply, the most suitable qualification for becoming a Commercial Procurement and Supply officer. It is also the summit of CIPS apprenticeships and the start of professional procurement accreditation.
CIPS Level 5: Advanced Diploma in Procurement and Supply leading to MCPIS status.
CIPS Level 6: Professional Diploma in Procurement and Supply, whose completion earns Chartered Member recognition.
CIPS Level 7: Executive Diploma in Purchasing and Supply Management, the highest possible level of qualification.

Onboard Us to Overcome the Rigorous CIPS Corporate Award Assignment Requirements

Last January, we received an SOS order from a guy who flunked all 5 modules of Level 3. They couldn’t imagine retaking 8 core modules after every 12-14 months to complete their CIPS Level 7. Am happy to report here that Ahmed Sayegh al Zayed from UAE is preparing for the 2025 CIPS Level 5 March intake!

Onboard us today and relieve yourself from the tough CIPS assignments, leaving extra hours to battle professional chores and to live life!

What’s Expected of CIPS Corporate Award Practitioner Students?

To successfully complete CIPS Level 3 for example, al Zayed had to:

Attend 100% of all online classes and seminars in 4 Core Modules and 1 Elective Module from the two available options.
Pass in all 30 Credits (six for every module) with a score not less than 70% in Objective Response (OR) tests.

Read more on CIPS Assessment Criteria and Grading Rubric here.

Complete 300 hours of Total Qualification Time (TQT) distributed as follows:
200 Guided Learning hours
90 self-study hours, And
10 hours of computer-based exams.
Perform office duties at work and still create time for personal life. It’s hell of a roller-coaster, I tell you!

Stop wishing for a 13-month calendar year because it’s not happening in this life. Instead, outsource tough CIPS assignments. Click here to Place an Order TODAY!

A Step-by-Step Guide to Writing CIPS Corporate Award Practitioner Assignments

Prep like a pro and get started on the right foot with your CIPS corporate award practitioner assignment. Am confident this step-by-step guide, developed by the cream of our experts, will redefine how you write future CIPS assignments.

Step #1: Give it a Thorough Preparation

Start with picking the perfect project. You may also seek guidance on the ideal topic.
Use contemporary, ethical procurement practices to choose a category of spend that reflects your organization’s goals.
Do your homework. Review extensive (multi-disciplinary) and intensive literature on the chosen thesis statement. Before writing the first word, conduct a SWOT or PESTLE analysis of the title.
Gather your resources. Organize procurement policies, supplier records, and market research materials for your assignment. Budget time and finances. Estimate and allocate consultants or mentors their respective assignment tasks. List required software and tools.

Important Tip: Rely on programs like Tableau for data visualization and SurveyMonkey to analyze stakeholder feedback. MS Excel is good with quick spend analysis.

Step #2: Gather and Document Relevant Data

Select an appropriate category of spend within your company using organizational analysis tools. SWOT Analysis, PESTLE Analysis, Stakeholder Analysis, and other engagement strategies are good examples. You can gather relevant, documented data from:

Procurement policies and procedures.
Contractual agreements and supplier performance records.
Market research and benchmarking data.

Some helpful tools include Tableau or Power BI for visualizing organizational and market data.

Step #3: Bring Theory to Life: Develop the Assignment!

Always remember to keep the CIPS assignment structured. I’ve found the ideal structure to be:

Begin with a catchy introduction and set the background scene for the reader.
For the main body, submerge the audience in deep analysis of the spend profile, supplier market analysis, and discuss sourcing strategies. Explain contract development, negotiation and implementation plans, and risk mitigation / sourcing strategies.
The conclusion summarizes and justifies recommendations. Make this section sharper than a chef’s cleaver!

Tip: Blend Contract Management Strategies Theory with Practice!

Learn how to use frameworks such as Porter’s Five Forces or the Kraljic Matrix. Weave in real-world examples and case studies, but keep to CIPS ethical standards and professional best practices. Tools to help you shine include Miro, Monday.com, Jira, Google Scholar, and Lucidchart.

Step #4: Review, Refine, and Submit

It’s an academic norm to have someone proofread your CIPS assignment for clarity, coherence, and concise statement of facts. Refine the paper and check keenly for compliance with the assignment guidelines. Source feedback from peers, software, your CIPS mentor, or professor.

Prepare for potential revisions based on assessor feedback. I recommend tools like Copyleaks, Calendly, Turnitin, and Hemingway App to create simple, impactful content that scores highly on readability. Only submit the CIPS assignment for evaluation if it can’t be improved further!

Also see CIPS Practitioner Corporate Award Assignment Example

Bonus Tips to Ace Procurement and Supply Chain Management Assignments

Make use of trending digital technology. Forums such as LinkedIn Groups, Quora forums, professional Reddit CIPS Communities, are the best to connect with practicing professionals. Coursera and edX offer supplementary online courses.
Stay organized and keep to strict assignment timelines. Try apps like Trello or Asana to manage overlapping deadlines.
For organizing references and citations, I recommend Zotero.

Psssstttt: Our databases overflow with recommended CIPS reading and reference materials. You can also access CIPS learning resources and support services here.

Do Things the Pro Way!

After checking the “Write My CIPS Assignment” tab, our experienced writing team immediately starts with the intricate job. To deliver an illustrious CIPS assignment that’ll win our clients A+ grades, we do things the pro way. Here’s a simplified order process:

Place an order on our easy-to-use interface, giving exclusive order details. We urge our clients to upload the whole assessment brief in confidence since our platform has multiple security layers. We need order-specific data such as word count and formatting guidelines from the instructions.
Make a payment using a convenient, secure payment method from the provided list. Ours is the most affordable CIPS assignment writing service in KSA for the quality. We also have a working refund policy ~ you’ll never lose your money with us!
We scramble a writing team for your order. As early as this stage, we assign expert niche writers, editors, and proofreaders for your order!
The task team breaks down the assignment requirements and communicates a phased timeline to the client. You can easily track the progress of an order at any writing stage.
We dispatch a research team to review the literature in key assignment focus areas such as sourcing, contracts, supplier management, and driving value. We want to use only the most current CIPS evidence for the order.
The writing team takes over. You don’t have to worry about stringent CIPS assessment criteria like content clarity, concurrence with professional procurement practices, and ethical considerations.
The leader of the writing team hands the final manuscript to line editors and proofreaders. Any slight errors that escaped the scribes are sifted out by our hawk-eyed CIPS perfectionists.
Our tech geeks run your assignment through the latest AI detectors and current versions of anti-plagiarism The TurnItIn report you get alongside the final paper comes free of charge.
Days before the submission deadline, we’ll deliver a final copy ready for submission after getting a second opinion from practicing consultants. Go through it, and if you feel there’s a need for revision, feel free to tell us immediately. We’ll gladly do it at no extra charge!
Ask your mentor what they think of the assignment. They’re going to commend you on finally becoming a model for CIPS academic writing. If you or your mentor can get others to sign up, we’ll give you a hefty discount on the next order!
Hand in your CIPS assignment through your center’s member dashboard.
You can now remind the travel agent that your vacay is due in a few weeks. A day after the A+ list of your year’s CIPS is released, kindly leave a Review on our website!

Also read

CIPS: How To Progress Procurement Career in Dubai

PRISMA Framework for Systematic Literature Review

The most prominent systematic literature reviews (SLRs) for healthcare research in 2024 is the PRISMA framework for systematic literature review. The role of identifying, synthesizing, and evaluating review results for evidence-based studies is best left to a PRISMA statement.

In healthcare research, PRISMA is an acronym for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. It’s a 27-item checklist designed to help clinical research authors improve transparency in their systematic literature reviews. A PRISMA statement elaborately covers aspects of a manuscript including the title, introduction, abstract, approaches, findings, discussion, and funding models.

The Four Key Elements of a PRISMA Framework

For a systematic literature review to record success, it should manifest these four key traits:

A well-formulated, specific question.
A reproducible methodology that avoids bias.
Sources review data from multiple databases.
An inclusion and exclusion criteria that is standard and predetermined.

From 1986 to 2024: A Brief History of PRISMA SLR Framework

The earliest known form of the PRISMA framework dates back to April 23rd, 1986, in Lima. A multidisciplinary group of researchers set the threshold for evidence-based reporting to assess the benefits and dangers of healthcare interventions. We’ve chronic childhood malnutrition and its risk factors to thank for this ingenious SLR!

The Swift Evolution of PRISMA SLR

A 29-man group of research methodologists, review authors & editors, consumers, practicing clinicians, and medical journal publishers developed PRISMA in 2005. After a three-day meeting and electronic correspondence, they drew a 27-item checklist and flow diagram to review literature evidence.

Ever since, there have been consented extensions notably in 2009, 2015, and 2020. There are adaptations as young as 2024; with future prospects of further extensions to cater for emerging clinical research needs.

Notable Updates in PRISMA Statement

Adjustments in previous PRISMA statements feature enhancements such as:

Tailored diagrams for updated reviews.
Additional scoping reviews.
Flexibility to account for evolving methodologies.

Some common extensions and adaptations of PRISMA since 2015 include:

#1: PRISMA-P

These adjustments are protocol-specific. PRISMA-P, as published in 2015, aimed at facilitating the development and reporting of systematic review protocols.

#2: PRISMA for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR)

Scoping reviews helps to justify a systematic review of the literature. The intent is to help readers develop an understanding of core concepts, relevant terminology, and key items to report.

#3: PRISMA-S

This adjustment focuses on the unique role of information specialists and librarians in literature searches’ reproducibility.

#4: PRISMA DTA (Diagnostic Test Accuracy) Studies

The main objective is reinforcing diagnostic and specific requirements of reporting for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (test accuracy studies) in abstracts.

#5: Outcome Measurement Instruments (OMIs) and COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) Initiatives

Previous PRISMA statements missed key outcome information in published reports. This extension aims to plug those leaks.

How Beneficial are PRISMA Guidelines to Healthcare Research?

Of all available SLRs, PRISMA is taunted as the most efficient, trustworthy, and with the highest reproducibility rates. The other five major benefits of using this SLR include:

PRISMA framework has the highest scientific merit of all meta-analyses/ scientific review models due to its high transparency.
Most scholarly journals endorse and reference the PRISMA statement in their guidelines to clinical research authors.
PRISMA reviews identify and prioritize future nursing research.
Addresses questions and deficiencies that individual studies under other SLRs miss.
PRISMA statements generate and evaluate theories on why and how medical phenomena occur.

Question: Can I Use the PRISMA Framework for Qualitative Healthcare Research?

Answer: Yes. The PRISMA statement contribution to existing knowledge necessitates its application in systematic literature review checklists for qualitative clinical data analysis.

The Components of a PRISMA Framework

The PRISMA framework for systematic literature review has three main components:

A checklist with 27 elements.
A four-phase flow diagram, And
An elaborate explaining document.

The PRISMA (2020) Checklist and Explanation Document

The table below details the 27 key elements of a PRISMA (2020) checklist. There’s also an expanded column that details updated reporting recommendations for each item.

Section and Topic	Item #	Checklist Item	Location (Where Item is Reported)
TITLE
Title	1	Identifies report as a systematic review
ABSTRACT
Abstract	2	See Abstracts checklist
INTRODUCTION
Rationale	3	Rationale for review in context of existing knowledge
Objectives	4	Explicit statement of objective(s) or question(s)
METHODS
Eligibility Criteria	5	Inclusion and exclusion criteria, how studies are grouped for syntheses
Information Sources	6	Databases, registers, websites, organizations, reference lists, or other sources. State date of last search / consultation
Search Strategy	7	Search strategies, filters and limits used.
Selection Process	8	Inclusion criteria assessment methods, retrieved report / record / data’s independent reviewers, and automation tools used
Data Collection Process	9	Data collection methods, obtaining / reviewing / confirming data from investigators, and any automation tools used
Data Items	10a	List and define outcomes for which data were sought
Data Items	10b	List and define variables e.g. participant & intervention characteristics and funding sources. Describe assumptions about missing or unclear information
Study Risk of Bias Assessment	11	Specify methods of assessing risk of bias including tool(s) used, reviewers who assessed each study, if they worked independently, and automation tools used
Effect Measures	12	Specific outcome effect measure(s) such as risk ratio or mean difference in results synthesis or presentation
Synthesis Methods	13a	Describe processes that decided which studies were eligible for each synthesis e.g. (tabulate study intervention characteristics against planned groups (See #5)
	13b	Explain data preparation methods for presentation / synthesis. Include information such as handling missing summary statistics and data conversions
	13c	Describe tabulation methods or visual displays of results in individual studies and syntheses
	13d	Describe methods used to synthesize results and rationalize choices. Describe the model(s), method(s) to identify the presence and extent of statistical heterogeneity, and software package(s) used in meta-analysis
	13e	Methods used to explore possible causes of heterogeneity among results e.g. subgroup analysis and meta-regression
	13f	Describe sensitivity analyses to assess robustness of synthesized results
Reporting Bias Assessment	14	Methods used to assess risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis arising from reporting biases
Certainty Assessment	15	How to assess certainty (or confidence) in the body of evidence for an outcome
RESULTS
Study Selection	16a	Describe results of search and selection process from the number of records identified in the search to the number of studies included in review, ideally using a flow diagram
Study Selection	16b	Cite studies that meet the inclusion criteria, but which were excluded, and explain why they were excluded
Study Characteristics	17	Cite each included study and present its characteristics
Risk of Bias in Studies	18	Present assessments of risk of bias for each included study
Results of Individual Studies	19	For all outcomes, present: (a) summary statistics for each group (b) An effect estimate and its precision e.g. Confidence /credible interval using structured tables or plots
Results of Syntheses	20a	For each synthesis, briefly summarize the characteristics and risk of bias among contributing studies
	20b	Present results of statistical syntheses conducted
	20c	Results of investigations of possible causes of heterogeneity among study results
	20d	All sensitivity analysis to assess robustness of synthesized results
Reporting Biases	21	Assessments of risk of bias due to missing results (arising from reporting biases) for each synthesis assessed
Certainty of Evidence	22	Present assessments of certainty in the body of evidence for each outcome assessed
DISCUSSION
Discussion	23a	Provide interpretation of results in context of other evidence
	23b	Discuss limitations of evidence in the review
	23c	Limitations of the review processes used
	23d	Implications of results on practice, policy, and future research
OTHER INFORMATION
Registration and Protocol	24a	Registration information for the review, including register name and registration number, or state that the review wasn’t registered
	24b	Indicate where the review protocol can be accessed, or state that a protocol was not prepared
	24c	Describe amendments to information provided at registration or in the protocol
Support	25	Describe sources of financial or non-financial support for the review, and role of funders in the review
Competing Interests	26	Declare any competing interests of review authors
Availability of Data, Code and Other Materials	27	Report which of the following are publicly available and where: template data collection forms; data extracted from included studies; data used for all analyses; analytic code; other materials used in the review.

Fig 1.1 : An adapted PRISMA (2020) Framework Checklist

( Source: Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71 )

The PRISMA Flow Diagram

Fig 1.2: The PRISMA Flow Diagram ( Image: Courtesy)

A PRISMA diagram has two main parts: a flow diagram and a checklist. A checklist has specific items that ensure transparency and completeness in the literature review report. The flow diagram is a visual representation of the search processes and criteria, from identification to inclusion or exclusion.

The Article in Summary

To make a systematic review valuable to its consumers, authors should prepare an accurate, complete, systematic, and transparent literature review. PRISMA statements account for what, how, and why the review was done and the outcomes.

The 27-item PRISMA 2020 checklist provides updated reporting guidance for systematic literature reviews. It reflects advances in identification, selection, appraisal, and synthesis methods of medical studies.

PRISMA is likely to evolve in response to new research methodologies, including AI and machine learning. We anticipate that adjustments will benefit authors, peer reviewers, editors, guideline developers, patients, policy makers, and healthcare providers to optimize their practice. This article hopes for broader use and wider adoption in diverse academic fields beyond clinical research.

Glossary of Literary Terms

Systematic Literature Review (SLR): The academic practice of connecting the research topic to existing knowledge.

Reporting Guidelines: A term in systematic literature review linked to the purpose of PRISMA statements in ensuring structured and complete reporting.

Risk of Bias: A measure of assessing the study’s quality and transparency.

Protocol Registration: Pre-registration of systematic literature reviews for transparency and adherence to legislative / ethical standards.

PRISMA Extensions: Specialized adjustments such as PRISMA-P, PRISMA-ScR, and PRISMA-S for modern systematic literature reviews.

Preferred Reporting Items: Another term for topic relevance in a literature review.

Methodological Rigor: The emphasis on a structured, intensive approach in conducting reviews.

Research Validity: The trustworthiness and reliability of research methodology or its outcomes.

Search Strategy Documentation: Important for extracting systematic review details, especially in PRISMA-S.

Outcome Reporting Bias: A specific type of bias PRISMA addresses, useful in NLP models detecting bias patterns.

Knowledge Translation: The PRISMA framework indirectly contributes to this concept by promoting clear and standardized reporting of findings.

How to Write Evidence Synthesis for DNP

There’s enough inbox requests on how to write evidence synthesis for DNP this past year to patch this article. Seems faculty heads are rolling eyes behind badly-scripted DNP literature, integrative, and scoping reviews more than any other annual averages. Before another instructor cusses, I’ll save your hide with this comprehensive, evidence-based practice information synthesis guide.

The Best Evidence Synthesis Methodologies (2025)

An evidence synthesis for DNP capstone papers refer to a succinctly distilled summary of appraised empirical literature, whether quantitative or qualitative. Its main purpose, according to Terri A. and Karen H’s 2018 paper, is to guide recommendations for practice improvement. Although content clarity is emphasized, nurse students should also outline and present their review in an easy-to-follow format.

And that’s where expertwritinghelp.com comes knocking with the best online DNP evidence synthesis writing service!

Want to gather the best background data from divergent sources and disciplines in support of your DNP project’s thesis statement? Contact Us NOW for the most accurate, current, and affordable DNP evidence synthesis writing help!

There’s a whole list of ways to organize and structure key findings from research studies methodically such as the Critical Interpretive Synthesis. In this article, I’ll expose final-year DNP students to 3 major methodologies, namely:

★ Cochrane’s ‘Summary of Findings’ Table

The 2023 Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice evaluation table expands Cochrane’s concept of a DNP project’s ‘summary of findings’ evidence table. However, most DNP students undertaking evidence-based practices using the Cochrane library raise concerns with its comprehension and result presentation. Yet others squawk about the imbalance of precision and simplicity.

Many scholars format Cochrane’s presentation summary either as a traditional abstract, infographics, a podcast, plain-language summaries, or podcast transcriptions. Each format suits different DNP projects and results in the individual audience’s best understanding of the literature review.

A summary of findings table has debatable differences in measures of acceptability (reading experience and user-friendliness) for different med schools.

★ V. R. Bowden’s (2022) DNP Literature Review Strategy

If you closely read the Literature Review section of Pediatric Nursing, 48(2) at pages 97~98, you’ll find 3 distinct DNP-EBP project evidence synthesis styles namely:

Scoping Reviews
Literature Review Summaries, And
Integrative Reviews.

DNP academia isn’t clear on the best evidence summary format from the above three styles. This is because choosing a guideline development heavily depends on the target audience for the individual capstone project report.

★ Mixed Method Systematic Reviews

Lastly, I recommend the mixed methods systematic reviews (MMSR) approach. This is a personal favorite since it offers a deeper understanding of the pre-study findings. Also, a researcher can easily catch evidence discrepancies while using a variety of methods rather than a singular synthesis technique.

Further, mixed method systematic reviews pinpoint how quantitative randomised controlled trials (such as cluster, parallel, stepped-wedge, and crossover) or qualitative research will focus on particular areas of interest in the final report.

11 Golden Steps You Shouldn’t Miss While Writing a DNP Evidence Synthesis

To make things super-easy for you, I’ve chronicled 11 golden steps you shouldn’t miss while writing a DNP evidence synthesis.

Step 0: Start with Developing a Solid Protocol

At this stage, rationalize the hypothesis and lay down a methodology framework plan. A planning worksheet for structured literature reviews ensures empirical transparency, reproducibility, and reduction of bias. Include a protocol template and checklist in the first few pages of your DNP project paper such as PRISMA framework for systematic literature review.

A 27-item Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist ideally covers the title, abstract, methods, results, discussion, and funding.

See Also: PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and PRISMA Extension for Network Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-NMA).

Step 1: Design and Develop Practical Project Research Question(s)

After identifying a knowledge gap in your DNP specialty, the next step is formulating a clear, well-defined research question. From a practical research question, identify 2~5 possible search concepts for the strategy discussed under (Step 3).

Use a research question framework to structure your evidence synthesis question. Here are 4 most common DNP project research question development frameworks:

❖ PICO for a Quantitative DNP Project

The research question is based on these metrics:

P (Population / Problem)

I (Intervention / Exposure)

C (Comparison)

O (Outcome).

For example, “Is gabapentin (Intervention) better at decreasing pain symptoms (Outcome) than placebo (Comparison) in middle-aged male amputees suffering phantom limb pain (Population)?”

❖ PICO for Qualitative DNP Projects

Contrary to quantitative studies, PICO for qualitative DNP projects stands for:

P – Population / Problem.

I – Phenomenon of Interest.

Co – Context.

Sample DNP project research question: “What are the experiences (Phenomenon of interest) of American (Context) caregivers providing home-based nurse services to Alzheimer’s patients (Population)?”

❖ SPIDER

This strategy covers 5 major elements of a DNP project evidence synthesis, namely:

S: Sample.

PI: Phenomenon of Interest.

D: Design.

E: Evaluation.

R: Study Type.

Example of a SPIDER-founded practical research question: “Evaluating the experiences (Evaluation) of Caucasian women (Sample) undergoing IVF treatment (Phenomenon of Interest) as assessed in Canada.”

❖ SPICE

Lastly, the 5-way SPICE model wholesomely addresses the project question under these components: Setting, Perspective, Intervention/Exposure, Comparison, and Evaluation.

Example: “What are the benefits (Evaluation) of a doula (Intervention) for low income mothers (Perspective) in the developed world (Setting) compared to complete non-support (Comparison)?”

Step 2: Pick Out All the Grey Literature

Although not peer-reviewed, gray literature presents valuable information that’s critical when synthesizing and evaluating available research evidence. You may consider non-academic or not-for-money literature published by organizations or individuals.

Any clinical literature from graduate dissertations, newsletters, government / NGO reports, conference proceedings, and unpublished clinical trials makes for gray literature. The following are some databases where a DNP student can source gray literature:

OpenGrey
Conference proceedings like CINAHL
Thesis databasesg EThOS
Other open sources such as Overton and trade magazine editorials.

Whenever you include gray literature in your evidence synthesis, document where you’re searching including the resource name, search strategies, specific URL, search terms, and the date. Also, strictly adhere to inclusion and exclusion criteria when selecting gray sources.

Step 3: Note Down a Workable Search Strategy

Writing down a workable search strategy takes intimate knowledge of bibliographic databases equivalent to our expert writers. We use the Boolean logic as an important component of writing your DNP project’s search strategy. When you Order DNP project evidence synthesis, we help you design a comprehensive search strategy across a variety of healthcare databases.

An Example of an Evidence Synthesis Search Strategy

Research Question: What are the health benefits and safety of folic acid fortification of wheat and maize flour (i.e. alone or in combination with other micronutrients) on folate status and health outcomes in the overall population, compared to wheat or maize flour without folic acid (or no intervention)?

Search Strategy: Key concepts from the question combined with AND: (folic acid) AND (fortification).

Protocol on PROSPERO.

Published systematic review for this question with search strategies used in 14 databases.

Step 4: Translate the Search Strategy

The DNP project paper requires the nurse student to search multiple databases, but not all research vaults accept the same search syntax. Every database has inbuilt, specialized search languages. Therefore, keywords for a DNP project evidence synthesis search strategy should be translated to pull similar empirical evidence between databases.

For example, a research question like “What is the effectiveness of Vitamin B12 supplements in reducing morbidity in pregnant women with HIV infection?” can have the following ‘searchable’ terms:

Key Concept 1 Distilled Terms: B12, Cobalamin, B 12.
Key Concept 2 Distilled Terms: Pregnancy, Pregnant, Gestate, Gestation, Gestational.
Key Concept 3 Distilled Terms: HIV, Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

Distilled Search Strategy: (B12 OR “B 12” OR cobalamin) AND (pregnan* OR gestat*) AND (HIV OR “human immunodeficiency virus”)

Examples of Search Syntax Translation Resources

Polyglot (translates search strings across multiple databases).
MEDLINE Transpose for translating MEDLINE (PubMed) searches to / from MEDLINE (Ovid)
Cochrane’s Database Syntax Guide for multiple database keyword translation.

Step 5: Register the Framework Protocol

Prior to conducting the full-blown DNP project evidence synthesis, first register your protocol. Registration improves research reproducibility and transparency, reduces bias, and ensures other project teams don’t duplicate your research efforts. Online protocol registration collaborates, documents, archives, registers, and shares your DNP research project, data extraction forms, and study materials.

Some software tools to connect and support research workflow includes:

Open Science Framework (OSF) connects and supports multidisciplinary research workflow. You can also pre-register a systematic review protocol and share Zotero library documents.

PROSPERO, an international database of prospectively registered systematic reviews in health and social care, doesn’t accept scoping reviews. The protocol records key DNP project review features and maintains a permanent online record. PROSPERO works best with Public Health, Education, Health and Social Care, Welfare, Crime, International Development, and Justice.

Step 6: Explain the Evidence Synthesis Citation Management Procedures

Once you’ve finished translating the DNP project search strategy to conform with each database’s syntax, the next step is to run the search. Next, export and save the search results in BibTeX, MEDLINE, RIS, or XML file format. Lastly, import the file information into a citation management program such as Endnote, Zotero or Mendeley.

A citation management software organizes and stores and all quoted evidence during screening. It further duplicates results and automatically formats in-text citations and bibliographies ready for your manuscript.

Step 7: Data Extraction

Establish a regimented data extraction approach / tools depending on the type and amount of DNP empirical evidence needed for your project. Most nurse student researchers we assist often prefer a table or a form to capture data for later analysis or summary.

Data extraction methodologies use electronic databases such as:

The most common data extraction tools in 2024 are:

Systematic Review Toolbox
Excel
RevMan
JBI Sumari (Joanna Briggs Institute System for the United Management, Assessment and Review of Information)
DistillerSR
Covidence

Step 8: Screen your DNP Project Evidence Synthesis Article

Article screening plucks unrelated studies from your DNP project topic and research question by using your abstract’s inclusion or exclusion criteria. Once you’re through screening the title and abstract, retrieve the full text and definitely decide whether your DNP-EBP fits the eligibility criteria of the draft synthesis.

Here, you may use tools such as:

Covidence
Rayyan, and
Excel

Step 9: Address the Risk of Bias Assessment

A DNP project evidence synthesis’s quality assessment (aka the critical appraisal) helps researchers to establish the transparency of evidence synthesis findings and results. Conduct a risk of bias assessment for every included study in your review. This eliminates individual study findings’ conclusion bias, for example design flaws that trigger ‘overestimation of intervention effect’ questions.

Important Note!

Scoping reviews DON’T include a risk of bias assessment according to the Cochrane Handbook.

You may present the risk of bias assessment in a table format, clearly depicting the strengths of each study and how it relates to multiple quality criteria. If a high percentage of reviewed studies have a high bias risk, be cautious when interpreting or using those results for your DNP evidence synthesis!

Step 10: Finally, Map, Synthesize, and Describe the Literature Review Results

You may present the main findings of your DNP project evidence synthesis through a number of ways including:

Use meta-analysis for homogenous evidence synthesis studies.
Narrative (descriptive) synthesis is the best approach to format literature review results where a student uses dissimilar studies.
Recently, major med schools prefer meta-synthesis for qualitative DNP project research. This is mostly due to the rigid processes underpinning meta-analysis and the likelihood of descriptive synthesis bias from its subjective nature.

Whether a DNP project evidence synthesis is qualitative or quantitative, I recommend you use a PRISMA Flow Diagram. The many adaptations in this evidence synthesis method is handy for audiences struggling with meta-analysis or systematic review components.

Still Can’t Make Head or Tail of DNP Evidence Synthesis Writing?

Your local librarian can only help you as much. You may also try to engage statisticians for data synthesis, but they will burn a crater in your wallet. expertwritinghelp.com will help you write this section of your DNP capstone paper ready for publication at a fraction of the cost.

Contact our writers 24/7/365 customer care TODAY and cement your DNP project’s evidence synthesis with search process clarity and transparency!

5 Signs You Need to Hire DNP Project Writer

The diagnosis is out, and here are 5 signs you need to hire DNP writer NOW! Every nurse student needs a professional DNP assignment writing service if they’re to pass the hard DNP coursework. Believe you me, it doesn’t get better than this!

Everybody can write, right? Wrong! Like cooking, just because you can scramble eggs doesn’t make you some Michelin-star chef. We’ve handpicked the best expert nursing paper writers with tons of niche DNP experience.

There’s a long list of DNP practitioners from the 14 disciplines on our CONSULTANTS speed-dial. We’ll also let you in on a limitless vault of nursing scholarly papers for the literature review.

DNP Scholarly Writing is Especially Rigorous

During my med school days, nothing scared the daylights out of us like DNP scholarly writing. Most of our clients cite 7 key challenges, including:

The DNP world can do with more protocol development trainers for quality improvement (QI) projects, especially at the design stage.
Defining a practice gap is very difficult. Don’t try it solo, you’ll surely fail! Contact us NOW for an insightful analysis of existing healthcare literature!
It’s also hard to identify and access DNP project sites. Securing a credible and dependable practicing mentor is an even bigger headache.
Let’s be honest: we’ve limited academic faculty support at the DNP project’s implementation stage. Throw in strict submission timelines plus a limited budget, and you’ve perfectly described disaster.
There’s as many evaluation criteria for DNP projects as are medical schools. Seems we’ll wait for another couple centuries before everybody reaches a consensus.
Newbies fumble with both the choice and use of QI measurement tools at the DNP project evaluation stage.
Other major challenges hindering successful completion of DNP projects include:
Choosing the best scholarly writing format
Problems with referencing techniques
Inability to develop practical research question(s) and an unsuitable DNP project topic choice
Inadequate faculty preparation, and
Presenting a sustainable, evidence-based practice research.

We offer tailored solutions to every DNP student who presses “ORDER NOW” including:

We supplement faculty support by offering intensive DNP project training and mentorship at no extra charge.
Expert writers who integrate tech tools with practical strategies to support your framework plans and the overall organization of the DNP project.
A task team for every order we receive, making sure your professor doesn’t wait for the DNP project paper submission.

GET YOUR DNP CAPSTONE PROJECT PAPER WRITTEN TODAY. HIRE A WRITER HERE.

5 Instances When You Need to Hire a Professional DNP Project Writer

Early on at lower medical levels, healthcare students can get away with average quality papers. Things turn immediately after DNP school; writing exceptional academic coursework is the rule. Topic choice mistakes, embarrassing misspells, or misrepresentation of medical facts, and citation errors will lead to heavy academic consequences.

After careful observation, here’s 5 warning signs that you need to hire a professional DNP project writer.

Scenario #1: A Looming Submission Deadline

Nurse school coursework, the endless lectures, ward rotations, and personal obligations can make you lose both time and your mind. As a rule, never allow a professor to hunt you down college hallways for delaying a DNP project paper. Instead of trusting scammers who’ll fail you at the last minute, press here and get timely, professional DNP practicum help.

Stop praying for a 26-hour-day because it’s not going to happen. Instead, quickly dial our experienced writing team. We let you focus on other pressing matters as we efficiently handle the DNP-EBP, ensuring timely delivery despite the constricting timelines!

We’ve delivered an A+ DNP project paper from scratch in a record 72 hours, and yours will be a top priority! Get a quotation for your DNP project NOW.

Scenario #2: When Colleagues, Mentors, or Third Party Consultants Recommend Decisive Editing for Your First Draft

While rewriting may look like an easy thing, it’s the most intensive part of any DNP project paper. Luckily, we have hawk-eyed DNP editors and proofreaders who are native English speakers. These guys will polish your grammar to a high shine and frisk your first draft for field-specific informational inconsistencies. The result is a DNP capstone paper that screams excellence.

Our proofreaders, editors, and writers will create a new edge on your DNP project paper. Engage us today and let your DNP practicum submission click with the audience. If your DNP project paper needs redesigning, connect to our 24/7/365 help desk immediately!

Scenario #3: Some DNP Students Just Have to Hire a Writer

Let’s face it: there is a crowd out there that can’t put an academic paper together. You’re most welcome to buy a cheap custom DNP project paper instead of delegating. Any number of reasons could lead you to our inbox for nursing capstone help, including:

You’re stuck in a rut, and there’s no time for serious academic writing.
You don’t have fresh ideas, there’s no energy left in you, or writing just ain’t your thing. This doesn’t mean you’re incapable or are a lazy bum ~ DNP students are also human!
Previous experiences with your masters and undergraduate scholarly writing tells you to hire a pro for the big one. We pride ourselves in providing the most affordable, premium DNP writing

Scenario #4: Your Grades are at Stake

This one is a no-brainer. There’s no reason you should knowingly deny yourself an A+ grade, not at this level! A properly-written DNP project paper earns you top marks, much-deserved academic respect, and contributes to healthcare literature.

Our team of highly specialized niche writers know every trick to wow your assessor. A pro writer will help put your evidence-based research atop the class with duplicable, ethical, practical, and sustainable findings. Beyond assistance with writing the DNP capstone project paper, we help with viva voce preps.

Scenario #5: You Can’t Write Without Using AI

Yet another reason you should holla me immediately! An assessor sulks whenever they taste AI in a serious academic piece such as a DNP project paper. Methinks AI is for the plain lazy, and should feature in the infamous “academic integrity fails” together with plagiarism and poor referencing.

Nowadays, everyone seems to want some machine or bot to do things for them. However, professors want to read a human behind the screen, not some dry AI-generated stuff. Oh, you shouldn’t use GPT to make a DNP project paper outline (even if you indicate so in the bibliography).

One Last Reason You Should Hire Us

For the unlucky few whose DNP project papers were returned unmarked, there must’ve been glaring errors. It may be a diamond in the dirt, why not bring it to the jeweller for cutting and polishing? Subscribe to our DNP writing service today and let’s stencil your name in healthcare’s hall of fame!

Hire a Professional DNP Project Writer Today!

If you exhibit any or all of the 5 signs above, you need to hire a DNP project writing assistant immediately! Hiring a professional DNP project paper writing service is just what you’ve been missing. You have enough on the tray already, so let a DNP-qualified healthcare writer shoulder the heavy burden!

Get in touch TODAY and start polishing your shoes for graduation day!

Pathways to Becoming a DNP Nurse Practitioner in Canada and USA

So many clinicians write to us wanting to know the pathways to becoming a DNP nurse practitioner in Canada and USA. In this article, we’ll see seven different routes, their eligibility criteria, how to apply, and the duration of each course. I’ll go one further with tips to survive DNP school and how to translate into a medical doctor (MD).

Are you ready? Read through this guide and make an informed decision about your DNP aspirations!

Also read: Reasons to Earn DNP Degree

Let’s Start with Application for a DNP Program

According to AACN, American and Canadian medical schools admit their DNP nurse candidates from wide study and professional backgrounds. These steps will scrub you if a DNP program is in your aspirations:

Choose a university or a medical college AND the specific DNP course of your interest.
Check the enrollment eligibility criteria for the chosen school’s DNP program.
If you meet the thresholds, write a formal application. According to the chosen institution, a DNP application document may include;
A curriculum vitae.
A clear DNP goal statement.
Previous academic transcripts.
Certified copies of your nurse practitioner license.
Reliable references or recommendation letters.
Any other on-demand proof to ascertain your academic and skill levels.
Attend and pass an interview; either in-person or online.
The faculty’s Admissions Review Committee stage sifts your application through a fine sieve.
Once you’re approved, grab your books and join the qualified few for DNP lectures!

Common Admission Requirements for DNP

If you want to upgrade your nursing skills or career in Canada and the USA, do a CCNE– or ACEN-accredited DNP course. But before that, there’s the little matter of admission requirements and eligibility criteria.

Note that these admission requirements vary with universities, enrollment pathways, or the chosen DNP program. However, certain academic and skill expectations are fairly consistent, including:

#1: Most medical colleges only admit students to DNP programs if they’re MSN-qualified (Master of Nursing Science). A growing number is taking Bachelor of Nursing Science (BSN) graduates directly into the DNP program. For skipping MSN, the latter take applicants through additional (bridging) coursework.

#2: A bachelor’s degree (or higher) from an accredited institution with a minimum GPA of 3.5 ( grade B or better), with evidence of core nursing courses and statistics. Keep in mind AP credits are NOT acceptable.

#3: Some schools need to see your GRE scores, require a specific minimum GPA, and ask for recommendation letters besides the nursing licensure. Other institutions require DNP applicants to pass a background clinical placement check before letting you in.

Note: Whereas the GRE Score isn’t a mandatory admission requirement, many institutions would rather you submit it!

So, How Long Before I Graduate?

Depending on the program you choose and the pathway, a DNP can take anywhere from two years to four years. The table below shows the average completion times for different DNP entry pathways:

Entry Pathway and Mode of Study	Pre-graduation Requirements	Average Entry to Graduation Time
From MSN to Leadership-focused DNP (Online, Hybrid, or In-person)	– Coursework in health systems and practice – DNP capstone project	2 Years
In-person, Hybrid, or Online MSN to Clinical APRN	– Core DNP curriculum – DNP project – Specialized coursework – Clinical hours (fixed) – Licensure exam(s) in your specialty	2 – 4 Years
Online and Hybrid BSN to DNP	– DNP coursework – Specialty coursework – Clinical hours (flexible) – Licensure assessment – Capstone Project	3 years full-time, and upto 6 years part-time (depending on candidate or online institutional scheduling)
Direct Entry Programs (Online, Physical, Hybrid)	– Bridging coursework – Core nursing coursework – Specialty coursework, Licensure tests, and Clinical hours (where applicable) – DNP capstone project	4 years (minimum)

Fig 1.1: A table showing estimated graduation time against different DNP pathways in Canada and USA. (Source: AACN)

8 Pathways to Becoming a DNP Nurse Practitioner in Canada and USA

These 7 routes depend on the degree(s) you have; and the status (or lack thereof) of your nursing license. Whether you’re looking to improve your salary, change careers, or specialize in a nursing field, here’s how:

❖ Direct Entry DNP (BSC, MSC, and Others)

Don’t crush that healthcare dream because you didn’t make it to med school for a BSN, yet. Some 20-odd universities I know in North America offer direct DNP entry avenues. You can still become an in-demand nurse leader with a BSC or an MSN certificate!

This pathway is for non-clinical DNP professionals. You didn’t imagine doing ward rounds and all that after graduating from a biomedical technician college. Or did you?

All you need is a minimum bachelor’s degree – or higher – from an accredited institution with a 3.0+ GPA. A GRE is optional, and you also don’t need a nursing license! You’ll then sit out requisite healthcare bridging courses, something that’s going to cost you extra time and money.

❖ Take a Pre-licensure Route

Similar to direct entry, you first clear core nursing practice program courses. After the first five semesters, you take an NCLEX exam and become a licensed RN. Next, you take the advanced nursing generalist (Master of Science) and earn a generalist master of science in nursing title.

The final phase of the 107 credits is the normal DNP curriculum. This is the longest, most intensive, and expensive pathway to certification as a DNP practitioner one can take.

❖ Post-Master’s DNP (MSN to DNP)

This is the most conventional route. Simply earn an accredited MSN degree, and automatically enroll for a DNP specialty. It’s also the shortest pathway to a culminating clinical career as you’ll take two short years (full-time)!

❖ Skip the MSN Bit – Jump from a BSN Directly to a DNP!

There are more than 300 schools in the USA alone ready to move you from a BSN directly to a DNP program. You can cut the two years of an MSN certification to a short eight months. This pathway is also prime for nurses with a BSN and a non-clinical Masters. But they won’t let you go on without prerequisite MSN coursework.

❖ Earn Your DNP Partly (Hybrid) or Fully Online!

According to an AACN report, 72% of PhD nurse graduates earned their degrees partly or fully online in 2022. Although you can’t do online clinical hours or miss the DNP capstone project, everything else is flexible. This pathway is best for nurses already at work but wish to further their studies.

Statistics Corner

Only 9% of DNP students take a full in-person course in Canada!

❖ From FNP Nurse to a Doctorate APRN

Those Family Nurse Practitioners taking care of your family at the local clinic can take online classes and become DNP. Because they are masters’ and doctorally prepared, FNPs only need a licensure certification exam in their state or province. After obtaining a nurse license, one can choose a specialization path and run away with a DNP certificate!

❖ And Lastly, Transform that RN into a DNP!

An ambitious RN with enough clinical hours but no bachelor’s degree can apply for a DNP course of their interest. In Canada, for example, there’s two streams to do this:

A yearlong, full-time Post-Master’s Certificate (PHCNP).
Other students opt for a Master of Nursing-Primary Health Care Nurse Practitioner (MN-PHCNP) which takes at least 2 years (full-time).

Before admission, you must meet the following basic qualifications:

112 course credits (70 credits in nursing specialty knowledge, and 42 in general education).
An accredited associate nursing degree with Grade B or better, plus a mandatory Statistics course (AP credits DON’T apply).
An updated RN nurse practitioner license.

Can I go from DNP to a Registered MD?

Yes, you can go from being DNP to becoming a registered MD. It’d come down to whatever med school prerequisite courses you’ve taken in nursing school, and your tenacity.

Depending on the specialty the applicant doctor wants, you may have to start with undergraduate med school. After attaining the prerequisite coursework, take the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT). Next, apply for an MD program that interests you in a university of choice.

Changing from DNP to MD takes four full-time years of study and the mandatory residency years depending on your state. The whole translation means 7-8 years of coursework despite the long journey to becoming a DNP.

Tips to Survive DNP School

Here’s 16 tips to help you keep your sanity during the DNP college years:

1) Never fall behind on either coursework or capstone projects. Professors at this level don’t take excuses.

2) Make friends, but don’t compare yourself to any of them.

3) Invest in quality DNP learning resources and online DNP assistance services for DNP coursework help services.

4) Start planning using a calendar and stick to deadlines. If you’re a spendthrift, prepare and follow a budget. Years have a way of becoming shorter once you start!

5) Search for your clinical site as early as the next day after admission.

7) Get the most out of lectures, campus life, and clinical practice. It’s these cumulative experiences that’ll determine who you become in your career.

8) Always be proactive, inquisitive, and never give up. Make use of credible online support services and resources like our free DNP project topic ideas .

11) Enroll and participate in professional nurse forums. Join nursing associations such as the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, NP Association for Continuing Education (NPACE), International Council for Nurse Practitioners, and other online nursing platforms.

12) Create some “me-time” amidst all the turmoil. Eat healthy, and get enough zzz’s – it helps, I tell you!

13) Know your DNP program’s requirements and prioritize your schedule. Set personal goals. Keep your focus on the ultimate graduation party!

16) Place value on constructive feedback from peers, mentors, and especially from instructors.

17) Must ensure you hire expert DNP project writers to assist you write high quality DNP proposal and project

Don’t Wait Any Longer!

Now that you’ve known the different pathways to becoming a DNP nurse practitioner in Canada and USA, start looking for a college pronto! Upon completion of the 2-6 years of DNP, you have a chance at translating into a medical doctor. Use the invaluable tips in this article to help you survive clinical coursework.

See y’all at the graduation square!